"Male doctors are more likely to have experienced medico-legal actions compared to female doctors. This finding is robust internationally, across outcomes of varying severity, and over time," concluded a recent meta-analysis.
The study, published online in BMC Medicine, said men were 2.45 (95 % CI, 2.05–2.93) times more likely to have been the subject of legal proceedings.
Legal action was defined as disciplinary action by a medical regulatory body, malpractice experience, complaints received by a medical regulatory or healthcare complaints body, a criminal case, or when a paper on the topic did not specify one of the above.
Data from 32 published papers were pooled and analyzed. At first glance, the methods seem reasonable, and the conclusion may even be correct.
But to their credit, the authors mention that the paper has some limitations which, in my opinion, probably invalidate the results.
In the study, medicolegal encounters could not be broken down by specialty because of the 13 studies included in the meta-analysis, "the specialties most and least likely to face medicolegal action varied greatly."
Five of the included studies controlled for the effect of specialty, and four of them showed that specialty did not matter. However, that represents only 12.5% of the papers in the meta-analysis.
The paper also was unable to examine the effect of the number of hours worked or number of patients seen by doctors of each sex.
Heres why these limitations are important. A 2011 study done by a group from the American Board of Surgery looked at data submitted by over 5000 general surgeons applying for recertification and found the average yearly workload for men was 506 ± 370 cases vs. 375 ± 261 for women. More cases performed means more opportunities to be sued.
Obviously the types of surgery done also could have an impact on the number of malpractice suits filed. Men performed significantly more abdominal, gastrointestinal, and laparoscopic procedures than women, who performed significantly more breast surgery. The table below shows the data.
A financial blog called NerdWallet looked at Medicare payments to physicians of all specialties per year and found that male physicians see 60% more patients—women doctors treat an average of 320 Medicare patients a year; men treat 513.
This difference was true for nearly every specialty. Here are just a few examples:
Again, more patients seen equals more risk.
Male and female doctors may not have different legal problems after all, but a paper which found that surgeons are taller and better looking that non-surgeons is certainly true.
Read More..
The study, published online in BMC Medicine, said men were 2.45 (95 % CI, 2.05–2.93) times more likely to have been the subject of legal proceedings.
Legal action was defined as disciplinary action by a medical regulatory body, malpractice experience, complaints received by a medical regulatory or healthcare complaints body, a criminal case, or when a paper on the topic did not specify one of the above.
Data from 32 published papers were pooled and analyzed. At first glance, the methods seem reasonable, and the conclusion may even be correct.
But to their credit, the authors mention that the paper has some limitations which, in my opinion, probably invalidate the results.
In the study, medicolegal encounters could not be broken down by specialty because of the 13 studies included in the meta-analysis, "the specialties most and least likely to face medicolegal action varied greatly."
Five of the included studies controlled for the effect of specialty, and four of them showed that specialty did not matter. However, that represents only 12.5% of the papers in the meta-analysis.
The paper also was unable to examine the effect of the number of hours worked or number of patients seen by doctors of each sex.
Heres why these limitations are important. A 2011 study done by a group from the American Board of Surgery looked at data submitted by over 5000 general surgeons applying for recertification and found the average yearly workload for men was 506 ± 370 cases vs. 375 ± 261 for women. More cases performed means more opportunities to be sued.
Obviously the types of surgery done also could have an impact on the number of malpractice suits filed. Men performed significantly more abdominal, gastrointestinal, and laparoscopic procedures than women, who performed significantly more breast surgery. The table below shows the data.
This difference was true for nearly every specialty. Here are just a few examples:
Male and female doctors may not have different legal problems after all, but a paper which found that surgeons are taller and better looking that non-surgeons is certainly true.
Kevin Diplacido- Fully activated member. Costumes Batman and Captain America. "I’m a veteran at costuming for birthday parties and charity events. Since 1992, when I did my first costuming at a comic con in NYC. Loving costuming, I started working for a party entertainment company as Tommy, The White Power Ranger. Wanting to do more events, I added to the heroes and characters I did, and I started my own party and event entertainment business. Over the years many charities have reached out to me to be at their events, and I have donated my time to them. I have had family and friends who have battled different diseases. Some have lost the battle to these diseases. Cancer, Alzheimer’s, and MS just to name a few. Many of my events are for adult, and children’s charities. The Heroes Alliance has helped me expand on that, and has allowed me to get out there more often to children’s charity events, and make more people smile. HA is dedicated to making children in need happy, and I support that very much. I look forward to our events, and hope there are many more to do, with my friends at The Heroes Alliance." 
